- Publish data on teaching efficiency (salary of prof/#students) and student evaluations on the web
- Give cash bonuses to faculty with the 25% highest teaching evaluations
- Split teaching and research budgets for each faculty member
- Require evidence of teaching skill for tenure
- Learning contracts between faculty and students
- Fund higher education by giving each student a voucher (as opposed to giving money directly to schools based on enrollment)
- Create a new results-based accrediting agency for Texas colleges and universities
A few reactions:
- The UNC system regs state that teaching must be the primary consideration in granting tenure, and that seems to be working fairly well here
- Metrics for performance in service industries are always difficult, but why would anyone infer that a professor teaching in an auditorium is always contributing more than one teaching a doctoral seminar with three students????
- Student evaluations are pretty reliable in identifying ineffective instructors, but not so great at distinguishing those who provide high entertainment value from those who create a sound learning environment.
- Now I can call my syllabus a learning contract.
- Faculty outside of science and engineering would have trouble attracting enough grants to cover the research portion of their salary, so making research self-supporting would mean less research in non-scientific disciplines.
- In addition to going to voucher systems, maybe Texans should auction off the buildings and land of their state universities?
- When we have open positions here at NC State, I will make sure our colleagues at UT-Austin and Texas A&M know about it.
- While there seem to be serious concerns in Texas about rising tuition, grade inflation and poorly prepared graduates, I was surprised that the TPPF report said nothing about the losing football seasons the Longhorns and Aggies had recently.
No comments:
Post a Comment