Twenty years ago the internet was supposed to "change everything" and defy conventional economic analysis. Nope. Did not happen. The internet lowered the cost of search, information, and communication. New products spawned by the internet were characterized by massive fixed costs and negligible variable costs. Key insights about the internet continue to follow from basic economics.
Now the hype is about machine intelligence. Three faculty members at the Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto have a short article on the HBR website where they argue that the economics of machine intelligence can be summed up as "lower costs of prediction." This means that firms will have lower costs associated with demand forecasting and inventory management, leading to wider adoption of these practices.
As prediction becomes cheaper, there will be an impact on other inputs into the production process, depending on whether they are substitutes or complements for prediction. For instance economists who make predictions may be displaced by machines. The authors think that judgment skills will become more important, serving as a complement to cheaper predictions. I am not sure what they mean by judgment skills, but presumably they are referring to cognitive processes where humans will continue to have an advantage over machines.
Machine intelligence will soon be coming to higher education. Some business schools are already experimenting with using tools based on machine intelligence to drill newly admitted students on basic skills in math and statistics. Will a machine-based socratic dialogue be next?
Dow hits 20,000
2 months ago