Two recent articles coming out quite differently on this question. In a WSJ op-ed the American Enterprise Institute's Peter Wallison argues that most other countries get along fine without any implicit federal guarantee of repayment. In a NYT op-ed journalist Bethany McLean raises concerns that banks would make significant changes in mortgages if government guarantees were to vanish, such as ending 30-year and fixed-rate mortgages.
In simple economic terms, McLean essentially argues that interest rate subsidies for housing are socially worthwhile whereas Wallison is unconvinced.
Beanie Babies
5 years ago
No comments:
Post a Comment