Monday, February 18, 2019

Economists' statement on carbon dividends

FT reports today that 3333 economists, including 27 Nobel Laureates and all four former Fed chairs, have signed the following statement:
Global climate change is a serious problem calling for immediate national action. Guided by sound economic principles, we are united in the following policy recommendations. 
I.          A carbon tax offers the most cost-effective lever to reduce carbon emissions at the scale and speed that is necessary. By correcting a well-known market failure, a carbon tax will send a powerful price signal that harnesses the invisible hand of the marketplace to steer economic actors towards a low-carbon future. 
II.         A carbon tax should increase every year until emissions reductions goals are met and be revenue neutral to avoid debates over the size of government. A consistently rising carbon price will encourage technological innovation and large-scale infrastructure development. It will also accelerate the diffusion of carbon-efficient goods and services. 
III.        A sufficiently robust and gradually rising carbon tax will replace the need for various carbon regulations that are less efficient. Substituting a price signal for cumbersome regulations will promote economic growth and provide the regulatory certainty companies need for long- term investment in clean-energy alternatives. 
IV.        To prevent carbon leakage and to protect U.S. competitiveness, a border carbon adjustment system should be established. This system would enhance the competitiveness of American firms that are more energy-efficient than their global competitors. It would also create an incentive for other nations to adopt similar carbon pricing. 
V.         To maximize the fairness and political viability of a rising carbon tax, all the revenue should be returned directly to U.S. citizens through equal lump-sum rebates. The majority of American families, including the most vulnerable, will benefit financially by receiving more in “carbon dividends” than they pay in increased energy prices.
This is the first such "statement by economists" that I have ever signed.  I believe that both major political parties are on the wrong side of this issue.  The Democrats are serious about global warming, but their idea of a Green New Deal will result in government micro-management of nearly the entire economy, millions of patronage jobs, and an unsustainable boost to federal debt.  The Republicans are not serious.

Fortunately neither party will be able to keep to their current positions.  A carbon tax provides both the opportunity for a political compromise that would actually work.  Given the right incentives, organizations will figure out the best path toward carbon neutrality.

Friday, February 15, 2019

Making sense of North Carolina's ABC system

No, I am not talking about the public schools.  North Carolina is one of a handful of states where hard liquor sales are restricted to state-run ABC stores.  The stores are widely dispersed, keep limited hours, and offer limited selections compared to other states where the private sector is allowed to operate more freely.  In a recent poll, a majority of 625 registered voters favored privatization.

I live in Cary, a town of 165k residents.  Cary has three ABC stores.  When I lived in Cambridge, Mass. as a graduate student, there were three liquor stores within a block of my apartment.  And they stayed open late.  And now they are open Sundays.

From an economic standpoint, the ABC system acts as an inefficient tax on alcohol consumption.  Every state taxes alcohol because demand is price insensitive (making it a great source of revenue) and excessive consumption yields some nasty negative externalities.  NC imposes an additional tax by raising the transaction cost of making alcohol purchases.

Hypothetically, the state could privatize the ABC stores and raise per gallon taxes enough so that there is no increase in alcohol consumption.  The N&O reports there have been some hearings at the NC General Assembly.   The level of economic literacy in this debate is not high.  A Charlotte legislator was concerned that privatization would result in the loss of the 2870 jobs in the ABC system across the state, apparently ignoring the offsetting creation of jobs in the private sector.

I am not counting on being able to restock my Knob Creek bourbon at Harris Teeter on Sunday any time soon.

Wednesday, February 6, 2019

Best music from last year

The Grammy Awards are Sunday night.  Based on my not-so-lofty credential as rock and roll critic of the Michigan State News (largest circulation paper in Lansing at the time) in the early 1970s, here are the 10 albums I enjoyed the most in 2018.  Most of them are not Grammy nominees.  My current tastes run to alternative, rock and world music, with occasional trips down the classic rock and soul memory lanes.  If you are looking for advice on the best hip-hop, stop reading.

1.  US Girls, In a Poem Unlimited; songs about women done wrong backed by a band that brings the funk
2.  Kacey Musgraves, Golden Hour; country is cool again
3.  Christine and the Queens, Chris; she sings (in French and English), dances and channels Michael Jackson
4.  Rosalia, El Mal Querer; flamenco is cool again
5.  Boygenius, Boygenius, EP; Julien Baker, Phoebe Bridgers and Lucy Dacus's supergroup
6.  Snail Mail, Lush; being an indie rock star beats going to high school
7.  Soccer Mommy, Clean; being an indie rock star beats going to NYU
8.  Boz Scaggs. Out of the Blues; best effort by an artist of my generation
9.  Beach House, 7; more dream pop from a band that keeps getting better
10.  SOPHIE, Oil of Every Pearl's Un-Insides, industrial strength electronics

Honorable mentions (multiple playlist-worthy tracks): Janelle Manae, Dirty Computer; the 1975, A Brief Inquiry into Online Relationships; Iceage, Beyondless; Hot Snakes, Jericho Sirens; Let's Eat Grandma, I'm All Ears.  

On Grammy night I'll be rooting for: Cardi B, Bad Bunny and J Balvin, "I Like It"

Saturday, February 2, 2019

NC State MBA team places 1st in Krispy Kreme challenge

Kudos to the 40+ Jenkins MBA students who participated in this morning's Krispy Kreme challenge.  For the second time in three years, they brought home the gold -- first place in the Casual Team category. The KK challenge involves a five mile run from the NC State Bell Tower to the downtown Raleigh KK and back, those in the Casual Team have the option to consume a dozen donuts on the way back or to take the donuts home to their family and friends.
More importantly, the KK challenge raises over $100k each year for UNC Children's Hospital.  This is one of NC State's signature events and I am heartened that so many students came out so early in the cold to participate.