Taxes due versus taxes collected

Catherine Rampell's WP blog examines the question of how much tax cheating is taking place and how much federal revenue might change if the problem were addressed.  Studies show that the feds collect about 84 cents of every dollar legally owed.  If the IRS were able to collect all taxes legally owed, it would collect an additional $600b, which is larger than the federal budget deficit of $590b.

Rampell recommends simplifying the tax code and increasing the IRS budget for enforcement and customer service.  It will not result in 100% compliance, but would get us closer to that goal.

Things economists agree on

NPR's Planet Money reports a six-step economic plan that virtually all professional economists would support, regardless of their political stripes:  (Link courtesy of Greg Mankiw's blog.)

• Eliminate the home mortgage interest tax deduction
• Eliminate the corporate tax deduction for employee health insurance
• Eliminate the corporate income tax
• Eliminate all income and payroll taxes
• Tax carbon emissions
• Legalize marijuana

Of course most, if not all, of these ideas are politically toxic.  MBA 505 students this fall will learn why these changes would help the economy and why they face an uphill climb politically. 

Bye bye to supersized beverages in NYC

There is an obesity epidemic in the US.  There are numerous causes, including sedentary lifestyles, more meals eaten away from home, creative innovations that make food fatter and tastier (why not a Doritos shell on my taco?), and lower prices for processed foods.  

How to turn things around?  One would do well to look at how we have dealt with tobacco products.  Through a combination of taxation and education, the percentage of people who smoke in the US has dropped from 44 to 21 percent over the last 60 years.   Textbook economics would indicate that a calorie tax combined with exercise subsidies would be the way to go.  Food retailers could make information about caloric content more accessible so that consumers could make more informed choices.  Examples: Panera Bread posts calories on menus; Cheesecake Factory introduced a Skinnylicious menu with all entrees below 590 calories.

How not to do it?  Consider NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s proposed ban on large sugary drinks.  It fails every conceivable benchmark of economic rationality.  It will be hard to enforce; anyone who wants 32 ounces of soda will still have plenty of options, albeit with slightly increased transactions costs.  It singles out beverages while ignoring chips, ice cream, ribs and all the other goodies that help us gain weight faster.  A tax on large drinks would do just as much to discourage their consumption and, as a bonus, give the good mayor more money to serve his constituents.  No wonder a food industry group ran a full-page ad in NYT depicting Mayor Bloomberg as Nanny Bloomberg, with the text asking "What's next? Limits on the width of a pizza slice, size of a hamburger, or amount of cream cheese on your bagel?"